• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: G7 press calibration, best press conditions or average?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: G7 press calibration, best press conditions or average?


  • Subject: Re: G7 press calibration, best press conditions or average?
  • From: Marco Ugolini <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2008 13:49:31 -0800
  • Thread-topic: G7 press calibration, best press conditions or average?

In a message dated 11/5/08 1:11 PM, Henry wrote:

> G7 is just a different method.  By either method, the press arrives.
> If it arrives at the same place by either method, then which is better?

The one that also (a) achieves stability and (b) maintains it with the least
amount of effort.

My bet is that the colorimetric route (G7, as opposed to densitometric-based
methods) is the better one.

Marco


 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

References: 
 >Re: G7 press calibration, best press conditions or average? (From: Henry <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Munki business
  • Next by Date: Re: Munki business
  • Previous by thread: Re: G7 press calibration, best press conditions or average?
  • Next by thread: Re: Re: G7 press calibration, best press conditions or average?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread