RE: G7 press calibration, best press conditions or average?
RE: G7 press calibration, best press conditions or average?
- Subject: RE: G7 press calibration, best press conditions or average?
- From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2008 22:37:03 -0500
Henry,
That was my very impressions at first too. I made many posts at the time
against it, on this List, calling the G7 method "elitist". But, in all
fairness, I'll admit it has opened my eyes about ISO-12647 and the
practicality of standards-based printing. So, I have to recognize that the
work done by Don Hutchison is serving a useful purpose -- good for him if
that made him richer in the process, he's worked and fought very hard for
it.
Roger
> > After that given standards are met colorimetrically, the G7 method
> > does infact promote densitometric readings for press control
>
> Yes it does, thank you very much. I have no problem with G7 as an
> optional methodology. What is troubling is the marketing of G7 in so
> much as printers of reputation must adopt it, or else suffer the
> marketing consequences. It isn't that it is bad methodology - it's
> that there are other methods that are equally satisfactory. G7 is
> ok. But, it's marketing and promotional philosophy for certification
> is, in my view, yet another "join the club", exclusionary based
> approach.
>
>
> Henry Davis
__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
database 3596 (20081107) __________
The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
http://www.eset.com
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden