Re: G7 press calibration, best press conditions or average?
Re: G7 press calibration, best press conditions or average?
- Subject: Re: G7 press calibration, best press conditions or average?
- From: Henry <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 11:09:29 -0500
On Nov 7, 2008, at 2:01 AM, Martin Weberg wrote:
After that given standards are met colorimetrically, the G7 method
does infact promote densitometric readings for press control
Yes it does, thank you very much. I have no problem with G7 as an
optional methodology. What is troubling is the marketing of G7 in so
much as printers of reputation must adopt it, or else suffer the
marketing consequences. It isn't that it is bad methodology - it's
that there are other methods that are equally satisfactory. G7 is
ok. But, it's marketing and promotional philosophy for certification
is, in my view, yet another "join the club", exclusionary based
approach.
Henry Davis
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden