• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: G7 press calibration, best press conditions or average?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: G7 press calibration, best press conditions or average?


  • Subject: Re: G7 press calibration, best press conditions or average?
  • From: "Martin Weberg" <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 20:15:20 +0100

On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 05:12, Marco Ugolini wrote:
>> On Nov 7, 2008, at 2:01 AM, Martin Weberg wrote:
>> After that given standards are met colorimetrically, the G7 method
>> does infact promote densitometric readings for press control
>
> Yes, because the assumption is being made that the inks and the paper remain
> a constant in the whole equation. Should those change for any reason, I'd
> think it advisable to do colorimetric checks again.

Thats right.

Martin Weberg
 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

References: 
 >Re: G7 press calibration, best press conditions or average? (From: Henry <email@hidden>)
 >Re: G7 press calibration, best press conditions or average? (From: Marco Ugolini <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: RE: perception and measurement [was: G7 press calibration, best press conditions or average?]
  • Next by Date: More on press linearity
  • Previous by thread: Re: G7 press calibration, best press conditions or average?
  • Next by thread: Re: G7 press calibration, best press conditions or average?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread