RE: perception and measurement [was: G7 press calibration, best press conditions or average?]
RE: perception and measurement [was: G7 press calibration, best press conditions or average?]
- Subject: RE: perception and measurement [was: G7 press calibration, best press conditions or average?]
- From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>
- Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2008 12:51:52 -0500
Klaus,
> Unfortunately we didn't. I never was in Ottawa.
I keep mixing you up with Klaus Richter, from BAM. So sorry :(
Hope we have the pleasure of running into each other some day :)
> No, not yet. I attended a workshop at the University of Aachen
> (Germany)
> few weeks ago and become acquainted with Prof. Hill's works on
> soft-proofing devices. Inter-observer differences are a common issue in
> his work. In the end his experimental soft-proofing station has to be
> adjusted to every single person when it's about highly accurate
> assessment.
Very interesting.
> I once read a paper to mark the 75th anniversary of the Standard
> Observer (I forgot about the author, it's quite possible that it was
> Mark Fairchild). It contained the provocative question whether it's
> time
> to send the Standard Observer into retirement. The answer was no as the
> scientific community is still searching for a worthy successor.
We'll keep an eye out for this important development.
MfG /Roger
__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
database 3597 (20081108) __________
The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
http://www.eset.com
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden