Re: CCFT versus LED [was: Spectros better than colorimeters for monitor profiling?]
Re: CCFT versus LED [was: Spectros better than colorimeters for monitor profiling?]
- Subject: Re: CCFT versus LED [was: Spectros better than colorimeters for monitor profiling?]
- From: "edmund ronald" <email@hidden>
- Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 14:36:55 +0100
Well, lucky us.
What I notice is that instrument designers seem to shun this forum,
most of the time. Which is a pity because I'm stuck in interface hell
at the moment and sure could use a helping hand.
Edmund
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Graeme Gill <email@hidden> wrote:
> edmund ronald wrote:
>>
>> Another interesting question which I know nothing about is whether in
>> the i1Pro design light cannot "fall between the floorboards" so to
>> speak.
>
> I don't think it works like that. The bandwidth is basically limited
> by the slit size and the nature of the diffraction grating. Even
> looking at the 3.33 nm CCD values, the effective bandwidth is something
> like 10nm, and the 10nm spaced readings are worse again. Even if
> the CCD cells have noticeable gaps between them, the optical wavelength
> discrimination isn't fine enough for light of certain wavelengths to
> simply disappear.
>
> Graeme Gill.
> _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
> This email sent to email@hidden
>
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden