Re: Media Testing for maclife.de (was: Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 5, Issue 290)
Re: Media Testing for maclife.de (was: Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 5, Issue 290)
- Subject: Re: Media Testing for maclife.de (was: Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 5, Issue 290)
- From: "edmund ronald" <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 06:40:33 +0200
What worries me is that while one can easily predict the performance
of Brand X software on the top of the range calibrated studio cameras,
I see no reason to assume that the cheap POS which Joe User owns
matches the original sample cheap POS that Adobe tested. We have
exactly the same situation for canned printer profiles - they work
very nicely thank you on something like an Epson 9880, but will fail
miserably on a supermarket give-away inkjet.
Of course, proprietaru software such as Canon DPP has access to
private maker info from the ROM of the camera which was shot ...
This might explain DPP's good work, more so than the details
of ICC or Adobe pipeline models ...
Edmund
- Show quoted text -
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 6:07 AM, Uli Zappe <email@hidden> wrote:
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden