Re: Media Testing for maclife.de (was: Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 5, Issue 290)
Re: Media Testing for maclife.de (was: Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 5, Issue 290)
- Subject: Re: Media Testing for maclife.de (was: Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 5, Issue 290)
- From: "Bob Frost" <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 09:33:13 +0100
Uli,
I got numbers, and I reported them. It's called science.
Ah! Its a first step along the science road. The next, and vital, step is
getting someone else to repeat the experiments and get the same numbers.
Only then can we assume the techniques and measurements are OK, and the
facts are probably true. Then comes finding explanations for the facts; then
more experiments to test the explanations. And so on. One swallow doesn't
make a summer.
You know, Adobe isn't the hub of the universe although some people here
certainly behave as if it was.
If you had just presented your results for discussion in an unbiased manner,
and not make derogatory remarks about Adobe, this thread would have ceased a
week or more ago.
Why not take the method that you claim is superior, use it in one of the raw
programs that accept it, and help make those programs into the 'must have'
programs of the future. Berating Adobe, a company you dislike, for not doing
what you want in its current programs is fairly pointless, it seems to me.
Bob Frost.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Uli Zappe" <email@hidden>
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden