• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Media Testing for maclife.de
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Media Testing for maclife.de


  • Subject: Re: Media Testing for maclife.de
  • From: "edmund ronald" <email@hidden>
  • Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 23:04:58 +0200

Lars,

 You certainly have a way with words :)
 I have to agree with you re. characterization vs. calibration.

 Re. cameras, my *feeling* is that for hi-end cameras, there is a
characterization of the physical sensor and electronics in factory,
followed by the burning of values in a ROM  that normalizes the
behavior of each sample.  In other words, the camera is calibrated in
the factory and Raw is really pre-cooked.

 Thanks for helping me calibrate my terminology :)

Edmund

On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 8:48 PM, Lars Borg <email@hidden> wrote:
> Edmund,
> It seems you mean characterization.
> calibrate : To adjust or bring into balance.
> Calibration is commonly used to mean adjusting a device so its performance
> is within tolerances. A printing press is brought into spec through
> calibration.
> characterize : To describe the qualities or peculiarities of
> Characterization is commonly used to mean measuring a device's (or process')
> performance, such as its deviation from the norm. When it's meaningful, you
> usually calibrate the device before you characterize it, as this usually
> reduces device drift in the obtained characterization data.
> Profiling, the process of creating a profile for a device, is (not always)
> based on measurement data obtained from characterization of the device or
> process.
> You can calibrate a light meter, but can you really calibrate cameras?
> You can say that you calibrate the sensor production process to keep the
> production variations to a minimum, then you characterize the production
> process to measure how much variation you have in the sensors on average or
> individual sensors.
> have fun,
> Lars
> At 12:56 PM +0200 9/11/08, edmund ronald wrote:
>
> I'm not very good on terminology, I'm using the words mostly
> intechangeably. Certainly, any operation done on Tiffs and not Raw
> should only be called profiling.
>
> Calibration usually refers to a process closer to establishing
> characteristics of hardware. In that sense, I'd call measuring a
> sensor's reponse a calibration. There are devices out there which will
> do this for you.
>
> Of note however, with a modern LCD with LUTs one changes the behavior
> of the display by writing in the LUT. That is a certainly a
> calibration operation as it has changed the hardware's behavior.
>
> Cameras are a different story. Assuming you're the manufacturer, yes
> you will calibrate the unit in that sense too before shipping it :)
>
> Edmund
>
 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Media Testing for maclife.de
      • From: Eric Chan <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: Media Testing for maclife.de (From: Eric Chan <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Media Testing for maclife.de (From: "edmund ronald" <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Media Testing for maclife.de (From: "Bob Frost" <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Media Testing for maclife.de (From: "edmund ronald" <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Media Testing for maclife.de
  • Next by Date: Re: Media Testing for maclife.de
  • Previous by thread: Re: Media Testing for maclife.de
  • Next by thread: Re: Media Testing for maclife.de
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread