Re: Camera profiling with ICC et al
Re: Camera profiling with ICC et al
- Subject: Re: Camera profiling with ICC et al
- From: Uli Zappe <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 23:44:26 +0200
Am 15.09.2008 um 23:35 schrieb email@hidden:
how could it possibly become a "good" profile by another testing
methodology?
And since we don't know what the profile designer choose (hopefully
scene with or without chart guidance), we cant conclude that a
profile is good or bad based on its performance against a chart.
Yep, but my example said that the profile already delivered bad
results for *real scenes*. These results won't go away even if in
other thests the profile fares well.
Stated mathematically, the camera profiling problem is
underdetermined. Its very different from a printer profile
evaluation which is not.
Agreed.
We are going around in circles at this point
Thanks for your time - I'm certainly not eager for more circling, but
I found this helpful.
Good luck with the rest of your testing.
Thanks. :-) Testing is already finished, though, what I need is some
time to finally write down something in English for the list ...
Bye
Uli
________________________________________________________
Uli Zappe, Solmsstraße 5, D-65189 Wiesbaden, Germany
http://www.ritual.org
Fon: +49-700-ULIZAPPE
Fax: +49-700-ZAPPEFAX
________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden