Re: Re: Media Testing for maclife.de
Re: Re: Media Testing for maclife.de
- Subject: Re: Re: Media Testing for maclife.de
- From: Chris Cox <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 14:51:19 -0700
- Thread-topic: Media Testing for maclife.de
A measurement cannot be wrong. It is just a measurement.
How you interpret the measurement, what meaning you assign to the
measurement, and how you compare different measurements can be wrong.
For example: thermometer 1 says 212, thermometer 2 says 100, thermometer 3
says 373.
All 3 measurements are valid, and might be highly accurate and precise.
But are they measuring different environments, the same environment on
different scales, different environments on different scales? Are there
other factors that could affect their readout (time to settle, offset,
etc.)?
To make useful comparisons of the 3 readings, you would have to understand
the issues with the measurement devices (scaling and baseline for each
thermometer) and document the experimental setup in detail (which
thermometer measures which environment).
Chris
On 9/15/08 8:53 AM, "email@hidden"
<email@hidden> wrote:
>
>
> The part I don't understand is why doing some measurements is "wrong"
> as long as it is reproducible. If people don't like the measurements,
> then they should just suggest some other measurements that should be
> done.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden