Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 6, Issue 90
Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 6, Issue 90
- Subject: Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 6, Issue 90
- From: Chris Cox <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:19:44 -0700
- Acceptlanguage: en-US
- Thread-topic: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 6, Issue 90
What lead you to believe that we didn't ask ICC experts for ideas, or work with device link software makers?
Just because we didn't ask publicly about an unannounced feature in an unannounced product does not mean that we didn't already talk to the responsible parties.
Chris
On 4/29/09 12:57 AM, "Rolf Gierling" <email@hidden> wrote:
Hello Chris,
I agree the situation is that not all DeviceLinks contain the psid
tag to identify
the destination profile, and the presence would not help either if
the profile
does not exist on the system.
But a smart way until now would have been to use the destination menu
in the
convert to profile dialog, or an enforced dialog to assign the
destination profile.
You just could have asked in this list for ideas, as well as you
could have asked
DeviceLink software creators in this list for support of the psid tag.
Regards
Rolf Gierling
Am 28.04.2009 um 21:45 schrieb Chris Cox:
> Marco;
>
> No, most device link profiles that we found still don't have the
> destination
> profile information in them. Only the most recent tools appear to
> embed the
> destination profile data (and they're still inconsistent about how
> much they
> embed, and at least one had to fix a bug because they embedded
> truncated
> information).
>
> That's why Photoshop can't reliably obtain the destination
> information. We
> have the code in place to do so, but, well, without widespread profile
> support it was kinda hard to test -- so we turned it off for now.
>
> Chris
>
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden