• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: GMG ColorProof vs. Kodak MatchPrint
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GMG ColorProof vs. Kodak MatchPrint


  • Subject: Re: GMG ColorProof vs. Kodak MatchPrint
  • From: Derek Lambert <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 16:34:33 -0500

It's not true that with GMG you must "specific" paper to get great results. As with any rip you can use any paper you want as long as it's LAB values are matching or are whiter than GRACol, Fogra or whatever specs you are trying to match. GMG has advantage over ORIS in speedy processing (ripping PDFs), well designed interface and great looking screened proofs.

Derek Lambert

On Dec 16, 2009, at 3:48 PM, Chris Protopapas wrote:


Of the two, I slightly prefer ORIS, mostly because it works with papers that
are keyed to specific printing standards and do not use UV brighteners,
whereas GMG uses a very bright stock and uses paper simulation.

Chris Protopapas
FUEL DIGITAL
New York City


_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
References: 
 >Re: GMG ColorProof vs. Kodak MatchPrint (From: Chris Protopapas <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: GMG ColorProof vs. Kodak MatchPrint
  • Next by Date: Re: GMG ColorProof vs. Kodak MatchPrint
  • Previous by thread: Re: GMG ColorProof vs. Kodak MatchPrint
  • Next by thread: Re: GMG ColorProof vs. Kodak MatchPrint
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread