Re: i1Display x i1Pro
Re: i1Display x i1Pro
- Subject: Re: i1Display x i1Pro
- From: C D Tobie <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 09:29:50 -0400
On Mar 30, 2009, at 2:33 AM, Graeme Gill wrote:
Hmm. I'm unconvinced that the Spyder 3 is better than
the Spyder 2, never mind the DTP94 (it doesn't seem
to be anywhere near as sensitive on CRTs, making measurement
of black problematic...)
The Spyder2 had a very broad viewing angle; this has been
significantly reduced for the Spyder3, increasing measurement accuracy
on LCDs and other displays with color variations in angular emissions.
The Spyder2 also had a removable baffle for CRT mode, which is not a
function of Spyder3. For these reasons you might find the Spyder2
preferable for reading CRTs at extremely low luminance values. But you
would also find the Spyder3 superior for LCDs, and especially wide
gamut LCDs.
C. David Tobie
Global Product Technology Manager
Digital Imaging & Home Theater
email@hidden
Datacolor
www.datacolor.com/Spyder3
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden