RE: How Adobe don't set standards #749 -- Rich Black
RE: How Adobe don't set standards #749 -- Rich Black
- Subject: RE: How Adobe don't set standards #749 -- Rich Black
- From: Roger <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 07:41:06 -0500
Martin,
I often use 100k 50c 40m 40y. I think it makes perfect sense given an
IDEAlliance repro environment --- never mind Photoshop.
Roger
>
> A friend called me today for advice on a rich black to use on a
> forthcoming ad campaign.
>
> During the conversation he mentioned "Photoshop Black" and I asked
> what he meant by that. He pointed me to a web page that he'd seen:
>
> <http://www.printernational.org/rich-black-plain-black.php>
>
> Where I am reliably informed that 63C 52M 51Y 100K is the most popular
> choice for rich black in my industry... because of Adobe Photoshop!
>
> At the bottom of the page this colour split is described as "The 'old'
> adobe photoshop black". No mention of a 'new' version, presumably
> because Adobe changed the defaults after version 5 and today's Adobe
> Photoshop Black is probably a much less useful 75C 68M 67Y 90K...
>
> --
> Martin Orpen
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden