Re: i1 Scanning Table
Re: i1 Scanning Table
- Subject: Re: i1 Scanning Table
- From: Derek Lambert <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 18:22:54 -0500
Yes. I have both.
Isis is much more accurate. Maybe .2 dE difference reading the same
chart. On iO with rev. D i1 I can get .35 - .4 dE.
Isis is also much easier to use and can read patches as small as 6 x 6
mm. IO on the other hand can measure thick substrates.
Derek
On Mar 1, 2010, at 4:21 PM, "Mike Stewart"
<email@hidden> wrote:
Can anyone tell me if the i1 scanning table using the i1 Pro (rev D.
non
UV cut) is any less accurate in its readings from the i-Sis Automated
Chart Reader. I'm talking about reading the ECI2002 (1504 patches)
on the
scanning table vs the IT8-74-iSis chart. I'm being led to believe
that the
i1 table cannot read the it8 chart and the iSis cannot read the
ECI2002
chart. Furthermore I'm being told that the iSis is much more
accurate in
it's readings than the scanning table. All I'm looking for is the
facts.
Thanks - Mike Stewart
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden