Re: i1 Scanning Table
Re: i1 Scanning Table
- Subject: Re: i1 Scanning Table
- From: Marco Ugolini <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 15:34:01 -0800
- Thread-topic: i1 Scanning Table
In a message dated 3/1/10 3:22 PM, Derek Lambert wrote:
> Yes. I have both.
>
> Isis is much more accurate. Maybe .2 dE difference reading the same
> chart. On iO with rev. D i1 I can get .35 - .4 dE.
0.2 DeltaE as compared to a range between 0.35 and 0.4 DeltaE? Is that what
we would call "MUCH more accurate"?
By the way, the fact that a device makes readings within a good margin of
agreement with itself is only a sign of its CONSISTENCY of operation, not
necessarily of its ACCURACY.
Marco Ugolini
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden