Re: i1 Scanning Table
Re: i1 Scanning Table
- Subject: Re: i1 Scanning Table
- From: Derek Lambert <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 19:12:57 -0500
I guess you right Marco. 0.2 dE difference is nothing these days. IO
is also MUCH cooler device. It's fun to watch.
Derek
On Mar 1, 2010, at 6:34 PM, Marco Ugolini <email@hidden>
wrote:
In a message dated 3/1/10 3:22 PM, Derek Lambert wrote:
Yes. I have both.
Isis is much more accurate. Maybe .2 dE difference reading the same
chart. On iO with rev. D i1 I can get .35 - .4 dE.
0.2 DeltaE as compared to a range between 0.35 and 0.4 DeltaE? Is
that what
we would call "MUCH more accurate"?
By the way, the fact that a device makes readings within a good
margin of
agreement with itself is only a sign of its CONSISTENCY of
operation, not
necessarily of its ACCURACY.
Marco Ugolini
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden