Re: i1 Scanning Table
Re: i1 Scanning Table
- Subject: Re: i1 Scanning Table
- From: Martin Weberg <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 01:30:50 +0100
Hi Derek
2010/3/2 Derek Lambert <email@hidden>:
> Isis is much more accurate. Maybe .2 dE difference reading the same chart.
> On iO with rev. D i1 I can get .35 - .4 dE.
Just a plea for a scientific approach.
Is 0.2 dE the mean, max or maybe median? What about replicates and
standard deviations? Is 0.2 dE significantly different to 0.35 dE?
Statements like "much more accurate" need some underlying proof.
Martin Weberg
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden