Re: fine art reproduction questions
Re: fine art reproduction questions
- Subject: Re: fine art reproduction questions
- From: Ben Goren <email@hidden>
- Date: Sun, 2 May 2010 14:12:23 -0700
On 2010 May 2, at 1:55 PM, Andrew Rodney wrote:
> On May 2, 2010, at 1:29 PM, Ben Goren wrote:
>
>> Second, please sketch for us your own workflow for copy work. How do *you* create a colorimetrically-correct reproduction of a piece of art -- or do you just throw up your hands because it's too hard?
>
> IF you would READ and hopefully comprehend the article, you'd see that when shooting raw, depending on the raw processing engine and options, that's NOT at all possible (hence again, Neil's point).
So, I guess all of us who have been doing exactly that for all these years must be dreaming or lying, right? Mr. Zaucha is lying when he writes that he did it for Mr. Kinkade, and no colorimetrically-accurate copies of his work exist? Or is he a deluded fool who just imagined it all? Are all those folks in Rochester just wasting taxpayer's money on impossible faery tales?
> I don't know why you think colorimetrically scene referred color alone is useful when it has to be output referred, at least as an end product.
I don't know why you're sending the SN ratio of this discussion into the toilet by telling people who are having a serious discussion about marginal refinements to well-established techniques that what they're doing isn't even possible. Do you also annoy microbiologists discussing effective ways of culturing resistant bacteria by shouting at them that the Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection is a hoax and that the true cause of disease is the sinful nature of modern society?
Cheers,
b&
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden