Re: fine art reproduction questions
Re: fine art reproduction questions
- Subject: Re: fine art reproduction questions
- From: Andrew Rodney <email@hidden>
- Date: Sun, 2 May 2010 15:22:36 -0600
On May 2, 2010, at 3:12 PM, Ben Goren wrote:
> So, I guess all of us who have been doing exactly that for all these years must be dreaming or lying, right? Mr. Zaucha is lying when he writes that he did it for Mr. Kinkade, and no colorimetrically-accurate copies of his work exist? Or is he a deluded fool who just imagined it all? Are all those folks in Rochester just wasting taxpayer's money on impossible faery tales?
I never suggested, let alone said anyone is lying. I simply provided a link to an article from the ICC about the question of colorimetrically "correct" color and raw processing which you haven’t appeared to read or perhaps understand. Which is consistent with your behavior on the subject observied on another forum list (no real surprise to me).
> I don't know why you're sending the SN ratio of this discussion into the toilet by telling people who are having a serious discussion about marginal refinements to well-established techniques that what they're doing isn't even possible.
That's the pot calling the kettle black!
Andrew Rodney
http://www.digitaldog.net/ _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden