Re: ICC update
Re: ICC update
- Subject: Re: ICC update
- From: <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 23:04:09 +0100
Hello all list friends,
Well .. as a long long time member of this list i remember, [say 8 years ago? :) !!] when edmund send to us excited post about new Microsoft efforts, and new great ideas, which will be developed and integrated in Windows, and, and, and .... so, seems like we all can see "what is the status of that" :) agree with Graeme
>> edmund ronald wrote:
>> By the way, there is still an elephant in this room, namely Windows
>> Color System - what is the status of that, and to what degree are
>> Microsoft now prepared to interact with the ICC standards process?
>The elephant appears to be in a coma, since Microsoft has removed almost
>all life support.
>Graeme Gill.
Wow .. i am really against ... think again
> edmund ronald wrote:
>There is one thing I like about WCS, which is that it is
>measurement-based. I would like to see any future ICC standard make it
>mandatory, or at least strongly encouraged, that a profile contain in
>a public format the measurement data which generated it. Some
>proprietary software already does this, I believe, but there is a
>temptation to strip this data.
>Edmund
True, true.
>Graeme Gill wrote:
>Saying something is going to be more robust because it's in XML,
>is rather like saying that a file is robustly interchangeable because
>"it's in ASCII". Yes you can parse the file, but that doesn't
>mean you can understand what it means.
Best regards
Kamil Tresnak
Prague
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden