Re: [argyllcms] Display Calibration Hardware Capabilities - Colormunki
Re: [argyllcms] Display Calibration Hardware Capabilities - Colormunki
- Subject: Re: [argyllcms] Display Calibration Hardware Capabilities - Colormunki
- From: vaclavicek <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 03 May 2011 01:04:10 +0200
- Thread-topic: [argyllcms] Display Calibration Hardware Capabilities - Colormunki
Dear Graeme,
I agree your words completely.
Importance of software in age of digital imaging is very crucial.
I would like to see some application which can get more from potential of
Colormunki than default driver/library.
Radim Vaclavicek
On 2.5.11 21:04, "email@hidden"
<email@hidden> wrote:
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 02 May 2011 11:16:43 +1000
> From: Graeme Gill <email@hidden>
> Subject: Re: [argyllcms] Display Calibration Hardware Capabilities -
> Colormunki
> To: ColorSync <email@hidden>
> Message-ID: <email@hidden>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> vaclavicek wrote:
>> Iąve already tested 3 units of Colormunki more than 2 years ago and I can
>> confirm bad interinstrument results on "blacks" of LCD (luminance range
>> under 0.25 cd/qm).
>
> This really depends on the integration time used. If it's too short
> (the default I suspect with the manufacturers drivers), quantization
> and noise dominate. A longer integration time assists greatly, although
> the lack of thermal compensation for the black level can become a problem
> if there is a very long times between calibrations.
> [ie. it's not the hardware as much as the software at play in this issue.]
>
> Graeme Gill.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden