RE: Any comments or feedback on i!Publish? (Lou Dina)
RE: Any comments or feedback on i!Publish? (Lou Dina)
- Subject: RE: Any comments or feedback on i!Publish? (Lou Dina)
- From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 15:37:57 -0400
One thing I like about the iSis is its consistency. Have you noticed that,
all of a sudden, your MX4s were iterated to a lower average DeltaE? Just
because switching from a DTP70 to the iSis? (I know you have different
results because of the custom charts you use, I'm talking plain vanilla
ECI2002) The best I could ever achieved with the DTP70 was 0.6 ish. With the
iSis, I get below 0.4. Same printer, same substrate, same everything. Of
course, I positively resent the disproportionate negative b* value reported
by the iSis on some magenta solids, relative to a 528 or an EyeOne or an
Spectrodens. I have seen the iSis reporting b* of -10 whereas the "other"
instruments gravitated around -5 to -6. Why? Lucky I have some tools like
HDM Color Toolbox to change the measurement data from b* -10 to b* -5 before
feeding the data to a gray balance algorithm or a good ICC profiler, like
i1profiler.
Roger
-----Original Message-----
From: colorsync-users-bounces+graxx=email@hidden
[mailto:colorsync-users-bounces+graxx=email@hidden] On
Behalf Of Terence Wyse
Sent: May-18-11 2:57 PM
To: 'colorsync-users?lists.apple.com' List
Subject: Re: Any comments or feedback on i!Publish? (Lou Dina)
I don't know....I've got both and still prefer the iSis. It's less fussy
about media types (canvas...no problem), chart bar coding is cool, has a
much better paper path (flat) and just seems to be better built.....but I do
miss the speed and single-pass UVi measurements and wish it had the option
of white/black backing of the DTP70.
Terry
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden