Re: RPP raw photo processor 64
Re: RPP raw photo processor 64
- Subject: Re: RPP raw photo processor 64
- From: Andrew Rodney <email@hidden>
- Date: Sun, 02 Jun 2013 11:31:40 -0600
> I hope I haven't suggested otherwise, and I don't recall anybody else who has.
There's this:
Ben Goren <email@hidden> wrote:
> I haven't found the same to be true of Adobe's products. That's not surprising, though, since their whole development workflow is designed around "pleasing" (presumably, pleasing to Thomas Knoll and those who share his tastes) images in a wide variety of conditions.
The idea that ACR engine is based solely or even partially on Thomas's tastes doesn't wash. He could do that by locking down all the sliders which would be ridiculous.
I'll go out on a limb and suggest that considering the ACR engine is within Lightroom, Photoshop (since version 7), and Elements, there are probably more photographers using that product to render raw than probably any other converter. But that's a guess. I've yet to hear the masses complain that it forces them to use Thomas pleasing aesthetics nor do I read from but a tiny group a desires let alone understating of colorimetric accuracy.
Andrew Rodney
http://www.digitaldog.net/
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden