Re: Colorimetric Accuracy in the Field
Re: Colorimetric Accuracy in the Field
- Subject: Re: Colorimetric Accuracy in the Field
- From: Ben Goren <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2013 10:30:46 -0700
On Jun 5, 2013, at 10:20 AM, Robin Myers <email@hidden> wrote:
> Adjusting the RGB values for the neutral patches to be equal in value is roughly equivalent to making the values "relative colorimetric".
Eh, I don't think it works like that.
First, the patches aren't perfectly spectrally flat. They're very close, but they do actually have a very small bit of color to them, especially the N9.5 patch.
Second, if they *were* perfectly spectrally flat, any failure to render them on the neutral axis would represent an improper white balance, something that should be fixed before the data makes it to the profiling engine. Otherwise, you're ``baking in'' the white balance, which will result in actually-neutral objects being rendered with a bit of color in shots where you do actually get the white balance correct. And my personal experience suggests that all sort of other things get screwed up as well when you make a profile from a raw development with less-than-perfect white balance and an exposure that hasn't been perfectly normalized.
Cheers,
b&
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden