RE: X-Rite EyeOne iSis with M1 option
RE: X-Rite EyeOne iSis with M1 option
- Subject: RE: X-Rite EyeOne iSis with M1 option
- From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 09:10:12 -0400
Graeme,
What I meant is this. Suppose :
a) I measure my OB paper with the i1pro in Argyll. I get XYZa.
b) I measure again my OB paper with the i1pro2 in Argyll. I get XYZb.
How far would you say XYZa is going to be from XYZb?
Roger Breton
-----Original Message-----
From: colorsync-users-bounces+graxx=email@hidden [mailto:colorsync-users-bounces+graxx=email@hidden] On Behalf Of Graeme Gill
Sent: 11 août 2014 23:34
To: ColorSync
Subject: Re: X-Rite EyeOne iSis with M1 option
Roger Breton wrote:
> Allow me to ask the $1000 question : how comparable is your OB correction method is to "M1" measurements?
Hi Roger,
I'm not sure what you mean. M1 and M2 measurement can be simulated as a matter of course using FWA correction.
Graeme Gill.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden