Re: Silly question department, Display Media White Point
Re: Silly question department, Display Media White Point
- Subject: Re: Silly question department, Display Media White Point
- From: John Castronovo <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 07:43:41 -0500
- Importance: Normal
In my experience and from what I've been told by those who know far more
about it than I do, GRACoL conversions aren't so different from SWOP that
they will produce less than ideal results in a shop that still uses SWOP, in
fact the results will usually be better. So why continue to use SWOP at all?
-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Rodney
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2015 5:12 PM
To: ColorSync
Subject: Re: Silly question department, Display Media White Point
On Feb 24, 2015, at 3:00 PM, John Lund <email@hidden> wrote:
I don't know. It's just amazing to me how universal that old profile
seems to be.
It's based on TR001 which hasn't changed itself AFAIK. So why change the
profile? A valid question might be, why set SWOPV2 as the default? Well
something has to go there and we can change it. IF you are targeting output
that confirms to the old TR001, SWOPV2 is going to be fine.
Andrew Rodney
http://www.digitaldog.net/
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden