• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
RE: Art Duplication [OT removing light fall off manually]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Art Duplication [OT removing light fall off manually]


  • Subject: RE: Art Duplication [OT removing light fall off manually]
  • From: "Miles, Peter" <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 20:04:46 +0000
  • Thread-topic: Art Duplication [OT removing light fall off manually]

Thanks Ben! That's exactly the sort of feed back I was wanting.
The affinity Photo sounds very interesting. I'll look into that

Best regards
Peter

________________________________________

Subject: Re: Art Duplication [OT removing light fall off manually]

On Sep 24, 2015, at 12:20 AM, "Miles, Peter" <email@hidden> wrote:

> by using using “linear Dodge (add)" on the folder that contains both these two layers, I can add these offset values to any image.

This is the obvious-but-incorrect operation. What you want instead is division, not addition...and, if you're not sure, do as I did to convince myself and spend some quality time futzing around with a spreadsheet.

Both addition and division will normalize the flat field image itself, but only division will recover the correct original values for arbitrary combinations of illumination falloff and subject reflectivity.

Photoshop does not offer a native division blend mode. It does, however, offer an invert-and-divide operator: Color Dodge. Layer the flat on top of the art. Invert the art. Set the blend mode of the flat to Color Dodge. And...Photoshop is notorious for being completely ignorant of gamma encoding; no matter what method you use, Photoshop is going to give you incorrect results unless your image is in a linear gamma 1.0 space.

Affinity Photo also lacks division but offers Color Dodge. But you can trivially set the blend gamma in Affinity Photo, making it vastly superior for color-critical work. And it beats the pants off Photoshop in lots of other ways, too. Its Wacom support doesn't feel quite as fluid as Photoshop's, but that's literally the only thing I can find where Photoshop still retains an edge...for everything else, Affinity Photo is at least as good, if not significantly better.

Cheers,

b&

 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden


References: 
 >Re: Art Duplication (From: Don Hutcheson <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Art Duplication (From: Iliah Borg <email@hidden>)
 >RE: Art Duplication (From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Art Duplication (From: John Castronovo <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Art Duplication (From: "Miles, Peter" <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Art Duplication [OT removing light fall off manually] (From: "Miles, Peter" <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Art Duplication [OT removing light fall off manually]
  • Next by Date: Re: Art Duplication [OT removing light fall off manually]
  • Previous by thread: Re: Art Duplication [OT removing light fall off manually]
  • Next by thread: Re: Art Duplication
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread