Re: gamma bewilderment wrt/ Argyll’s documentation
Re: gamma bewilderment wrt/ Argyll’s documentation
- Subject: Re: gamma bewilderment wrt/ Argyll’s documentation
- From: Graeme Gill <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 14:17:25 +1100
Uli Zappe wrote:
Am 29.03.2016 um 22:28 schrieb Martin Orpen<email@hidden>:
Because the people in those television studios *own* this slice of science!
The relationship between display and camera was their territory long before ours.
And is correspondingly outdated ...
If you want to make a break with the bazillion sRGB encoded images out there,
then be my guest. But establishing a new standard is not exactly easy
(how many effective competitors to Pantone are there ?)
Even if I accept the argument of these awe-inspiring “television studio scientists”
that
television studios are brighter than the environment of my TV set, what does all this have
to do with color management on computers? My computer is used in a much brighter
environment than my TV set and I do not use it to reproduce content recorded in television
studios – sooooo ..... ?
If all you want to do is look at your own images, then set it up any way
you please. But if you want to send those images to someone else and have
them see what you see, then it's important to understand (on average) how their
displays are set up.
Graeme Gill.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden