Re: Epson canned profiles
Re: Epson canned profiles
- Subject: Re: Epson canned profiles
- From: Andrew Rodney <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 16:41:01 -0600
> From: Henry Davis
> Andrew's reply was:
>
> "Moot."
>
>
> This should be called "The Thread of Lost Opportunities". Printing is moot?
> Not if context matters!
> Andrew, you can't help but turn up the heat even when opportunities for
> agreement come up - you enjoy jerking peoples' chains. Can't you ever at
> least try to be less argumentative and give dialogue a chance to lead to
> understanding? "I win, I win" - sums it up so far.
> There are important things that could have been learned from this thread but
> they've been lost and readers that may have had an interest
It's moot Henry because it's utterly off topic.
It's moot because it's Ben's method of distracting from his proven
misinformation about Epson printers, it's driver, and profiles for it (canned
or otherwise).
Apparently his distraction worked on you!
Please examine the title of this post.
Now examine the initial first post and question from Steve:
> I am using the canned printer profiles that came with my Epson P5000 my
> question is when setting the “Output Resolution”
> by default it brings up SuperPhoto 1440 DPI, Super MicroWeave, and High Speed”
> Should I be changing any of those setting? I assume when Epson created the
> profiles thats how the printer was setup or does it not matter?
The correct answer, the one colorimetrically proven is no, it doesn't matter.
The differences are tiny and invisible.
Ben states otherwise while admitting zero experience with Epson printers and
zero data to back up his FUD that 'it is a problem'. It isn't a problem. It was
proven that Ben's so called problem is incorrect with no less than three
differing settings in the Epson driver to print targets for profile creation,
which were measured and compared.
Now if you and Ben want to go off topic about something other than the question
asked, his OT diarrhoea of the keyboard ("Get an inversion in your profile of
even a very small amount and it'll stick > out like a sore thumb"), then please
start a new topic rather than hijack this one with text designed to misdirect
from the facts that have proven Ben to be wrong. Maybe he will actually have
some data to share about this new topic, but I wouldn't hold my breath waiting
on ot!
Now do you see why what he wrote is moot and HOW context matters?
Now do you see why what he wrote is moot and was wrong?
Andrew Rodney
http://www.digitaldog.net/ <http://www.digitaldog.net/>
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden