Re: Humans (and cameras and scanners) do not have a color gamut (?)
Re: Humans (and cameras and scanners) do not have a color gamut (?)
- Subject: Re: Humans (and cameras and scanners) do not have a color gamut (?)
- From: Henry Davis via colorsync-users <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2020 10:06:04 -0500
That’s pretty stong; there are very few words stronger than “fool” to describe
a person. Even so, limiting it to just 2 kinds seems to leave out quite a
number of likely candidates.
Henry Davis
>
> On Jan 10, 2020, at 6:02 PM, Martin Orpen via colorsync-users
> <email@hidden <mailto:email@hidden>>
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 10 Jan 2020, at 23:40, Andrew Rodney via colorsync-users
>>> <email@hidden <mailto:email@hidden>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I think you should read, slowly, perhaps several times
>>
>>
>> I think you should read this slowly, perhaps several times too:
>>
>>
>> color-gamut
>> The limits of the array of colours that can be captured by an
>> image-capturing device, represented by a color-encoding data metric, or
>> physically realized by an output device or medium.
>
> No reason to read, let alone repeatedly, something that multiple color
> scientists have stated isn’t correct.
>
> "There are two kinds of fools: those who can't change their opinions and
> those who won't." -Josh Billings
>
> Andrew Rodney
> http://www.digitaldog.net/ <http://www.digitaldog.net/>
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden