• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: SOT: performance
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: SOT: performance


  • Subject: Re: SOT: performance
  • From: Carsten Gehle <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 22:16:25 +0100

On Tuesday, December 17, 2002, at 09:46 PM, Marc Poirier wrote:

Just a quick question... my TiBook 550 / 256, OS X 10.2, is proving to be
unacceptably slow building AU with ProjectBuilder, and feels very laggy in
general (compared to the same machine running Classic and building VST
plugins [yes, I know VST is simpler than AU],

APIs aside, I'm also guessing that you're comparing building VST with CW
and building AU with PB. I think that the bigger issue is the compiler.
PB (or more specifically, gcc) builds WAAAY more slowly than CW. I love a
lot of things about PB and gcc, but definitely my big gripe (and I'm
certainly not alone) is speed of compiling.

Yes, it's a problem of gcc (or jam ?), especially when you are building C++ files. For plain C it's much faster and for Objective-C it's fast enough, I think. I don't know what Apple did with the gcc, but on the old Mac OS X Server 1.x is was about 12 times faster (as it is on other operating systems). Anyway, to speed up the compiler, I'd highly recommend to use precompiled header files. With our Carbon projects compiling takes half of the time since we are using this, though it is still about 5 to 10 times slower than the same project compiled with CodeWarrior.

IMO Apple should fix this asap, compiling mid size projects is not fun at the moment.

Anyone working with a machine of this sort of spec? I'm wondering if an
extra 256M ram is going to make all the difference or whether I should
start saving up for a new Powerbook (or even a Dual G4 desktop) already :-(

Does it have 256 now? Mac OS X likes to use a lot of memory, and I used
to use it with only 256 MB of RAM. When I upgraded to 512 MB, I felt a
big difference. :) So I would recommend at least 512 MB...

Right, 512 MB is the recommend minimum. A dual processor would not help much; as far as I know ggc is using only one at a time (though you'd have a faster processor, a faster harddrive, faster RAM and the PB GUI stuff could be done by the second processor, of course).

Carsten
_______________________________________________
coreaudio-api mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/coreaudio-api
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: SOT: performance
      • From: Marc Poirier <email@hidden>
  • Prev by Date: Re: SOT: performance
  • Next by Date: Re: SOT: performance
  • Previous by thread: Re: SOT: performance
  • Next by thread: Re: SOT: performance
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread