Re: carbon or cocoa?
Re: carbon or cocoa?
- Subject: Re: carbon or cocoa?
- From: Os <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 20:08:57 +0000
Thanks for the reply. Sounds like Carbon is the way to go for now.
Can you give me an example of what you're thinking of when you say
"I would only create a Cocoa view if you feel that it would add
something above and beyond what a Carbon view would give you"
?
cheers,
os.
On 18 Mar 2004, at 17:31, David Duncan wrote:
On Mar 18, 2004, at 12:02 PM, Os wrote:
what's the current wisdom on whether to support Carbon or Cocoa Views
for AudioUnits? I was looking at the example in the SDK which creates
a Cocoa view, but the only app that seems to support it is the
example hosting app.
I'd like to embrace the Cocoa technology but it seems a bit pointless
if none of the users of my AUs are going to be able to see the GUIs
in e.g Digital Performer, Numerology etc.
Currently most hosts understand Carbon views, so if you plan to make a
view, a Carbon one would seem to be required for largest adoption. If
you decide you want to make a Cocoa view as well, then it will not
likely see much use until more Cocoa hosts appear, but additionally to
that I would only create a Cocoa view if you feel that it would add
something above and beyond what a Carbon view would give you for those
hosts that use Cocoa views.
It would also be a very good idea to join the Carbon-Dev and/or
Cocoa-Dev lists if you are unfamiliar with those technologies.
--
Reality is what, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away.
Failure is not an option. It is a privilege reserved for those who try.
David Duncan
email@hidden
http://www.collective.co.uk/
_______________________________________________
coreaudio-api mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/coreaudio-api
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.