Re: carbon or cocoa?
Re: carbon or cocoa?
- Subject: Re: carbon or cocoa?
- From: David Duncan <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 15:16:16 -0500
On Mar 18, 2004, at 03:08 PM, Os wrote:
Thanks for the reply. Sounds like Carbon is the way to go for now.
Can you give me an example of what you're thinking of when you say
"I would only create a Cocoa view if you feel that it would add
something above and beyond what a Carbon view would give you"
In general there are things which are supported in Carbon or Cocoa that
is not supported in the other. If you felt that support for some
service provided by Cocoa and not Carbon would improve your view, then
that might be a reason to write a Cocoa view for the wider world.
On Mar 18, 2004, at 01:05 PM, Mark's Studio wrote:
I will just say that i have managed to make a AU with a Cocoa view that
works in a host that only supports Carbon views, so it's possible.
I am curious as to how you did this, since Cocoa in Carbon currently
only works at the window level and the only Cocoa widget I know of that
works in a Carbon window, (the WebView) I understand goes through all
manners of hackery to work.
--
Reality is what, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away.
Failure is not an option. It is a privilege reserved for those who try.
David Duncan
_______________________________________________
coreaudio-api mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/coreaudio-api
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.