Re: Channels and frames
Re: Channels and frames
- Subject: Re: Channels and frames
- From: William Stewart <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 14:20:40 -0800
"John"
I'd have to agree with Marc - I haven't read his emails as being
rude, but I do sense some resistance as he alludes to below.
When you are dealing with multiple specifications I think it is not
unreasonable to expect differences. Some differences should be
expected, and as I've said previously, I think its beholden on you
(and ever other plug-in developer) to both understand those
differences and handle them in a compatible way. Its at least a
reasonable point of view to suggest that these differences are on the
whole pretty minor, so some work to provide good solutions in both
areas is not unreasonable.
Publishing a version number of zero is not a solution. Publishing the
channel capabilities of an AU and not changing them is how the AU
specification works. Changing the channel capabilities is considered
by us as a change that would be signalled through a new release of
the AU - thus a need to change the version of the AU.
If you are not aware of the other applications that host AudioUnits
on Mac OS X, then you are probably missing opportunities to appeal to
user communities that might like to utilise your AU (or in marketing-
speak, you are missing sales!). There is no doubt that Logic is an
important product, but Garage Band is shipped on *every* new mac that
is sold, and is also available for separate purchase - it is a very
widely used product. Sound Track Pro is a new product that has a
growing number of users, particular in the post-production video
market (amongst others). MoTU's Digital Performer is also a very good
and popular sequencer, just to name a few.
Bill
On 01/11/2005, at 12:38 PM, Marc Poirier wrote:
On Nov 1, 2005, at 11:54 AM, john smith wrote:
A problem that has been tackled many times before. It's called
branching your code when necessary.
Please lets not be rude here. You asked why I had the problem, and
I answered. Of course I know how to remove it from the interface
if neccasary, that's not the question at all.
If you're going to be rude to me, I'd rather not answer your
questions.
Okay. I haven't been asking questions, I've been trying to answer
yours.
Though it doesn't seem that you actually want to hear possible
solutions. I'm not sure why, and really I'm not trying to be rude,
but at a point, it's hard to figure out how to help someone when
they ask for help, but claim that any proposed ideas that would
involve actually doing something to solve the problem would be
unmanageable. I'm not sure, do you just want to hear yourself
justify why you're not going to work on a better solution? I'm not
invested in whatever project you're working on, but I'll try to
give helpful ideas if folks ask questions, but if you don't really
want help or ideas, I'm not sure what else to say...
Marc
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Coreaudio-api mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
--
mailto:email@hidden
tel: +1 408 974 4056
________________________________________________________________________
__
"Much human ingenuity has gone into finding the ultimate Before.
The current state of knowledge can be summarized thus:
In the beginning, there was nothing, which exploded" - Terry Pratchett
________________________________________________________________________
__
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Coreaudio-api mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden