Re: Jack / Soundflower vs DRM
Re: Jack / Soundflower vs DRM
- Subject: Re: Jack / Soundflower vs DRM
- From: Billy Youdelman <email@hidden>
- Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 09:35:06 -0700 (MST)
jbrave <email@hidden> wrote -
> Isn't part of the problem with this discussion that
> Jack and other simillar(?) stuff is an easy way to circumvent
> Apple's DRM protection of iTunes store tunes?
The need for, and uses of Jack and similar programs goes far beyond a
teenager or college student trying to rip a copy of his favorite
song. That can be done much easier without Jack.
Throwing a roadblock in the patch of technological progress out of
fear that someone will use the tech for questionable purposes seems a
little bit silly, or short sighted to me.
Here is some recommended (by me, heh..) reading on this subject -
| A Cost Analysis of Windows Vista Content Protection
| ===================================================
|
| Peter Gutmann, email@hidden
| http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/pubs/vista_cost.txt
The people who are most interested in technology like Jack are pro-
audio users.
I am one of these...
Billy Youdelman
+1 310 839 7673
email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Coreaudio-api mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden