• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Quality of CoreAudio SRC
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Quality of CoreAudio SRC


  • Subject: Re: Quality of CoreAudio SRC
  • From: Chris Johnson <email@hidden>
  • Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 02:02:06 -0500


On Feb 1, 2008, at 12:52 AM, Brian Willoughby wrote:

I am surprised that Benchmark chose USB, since that interface requires jitter removal. No matter how good your jitter removal, it's never as good as a local, crystal clock. ...

According to Dan Lavry, FireWire is too expensive to develop for, although with his prices I don't see how it would be much different.

Sorry to talk near-audiophile language here, but this list combines a unique collection of software engineers and FireWire designers (Metric Halo and maybe even MOTU and RME). I have been trying to identify the ultimate audio interface for Mac, along with the correct software to drive it. I am up to the task of developing the software, and even drivers if need be, but the research on the possibilities for hardware is still ongoing.

I would imagine it has a lot to do with your requirements for latency. If you need low latency, it's hard to beat stuff clocked within the computer itself, but that will have its own limitations.


Funny that you should mention Lavry, because I use one of his Lavry Blacks for most of my monitoring of serious work. If it was USB I can't see how it would be much different, because Lavry's reclocking is so comprehensive that it incurs enormous latency. I cannot track through this unit (even on 'wide' clock acceptance, oddly enough!) but I haven't had any complaints about its audiophile qualities- when clocking it to 'crystal', the sound is seriously unjittery.

Of course, that IS a local, crystal clock- hence the name. So I guess your point stands :)

But again- I absolutely cannot track through the amount of latency this DAC incurs, on any setting. It's a playback/mixing/mastering DAC.


Chris Johnson airwindows _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Coreaudio-api mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
References: 
 >Quality of CoreAudio SRC (From: Brian Willoughby <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Quality of CoreAudio SRC (From: Stephen Davis <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Quality of CoreAudio SRC (From: "Mikael Hakman" <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Quality of CoreAudio SRC (From: Brian Willoughby <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Quality of CoreAudio SRC
  • Previous by thread: Re: Quality of CoreAudio SRC
  • Next by thread: Re: Quality of CoreAudio SRC
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread