• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Internal multi-channels
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Internal multi-channels


  • Subject: Re: Internal multi-channels
  • From: Philippe GRUCHET <email@hidden>
  • Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 08:23:01 +0200

Brian,

I believe that Tahome is right.

He is right! :-)

Unless you specifically have a multichannel AU which implements a 12- voice harmonizer,

No. I implemented my polyphonic pitch-tracker FFT-based.

and you don't have the source,

I have the source.

then there's no real advantage to passing the data around among several different pieces. Just take the mono input, process it 12 ways in your own code, then mix the results in your own code to 1 or 2 outputs, depending upon whether you want mono or stereo output.

That's the current state of my code but I don't like the mixed result: too spectral.


There is no 'requirement' that you use AU.

MatrixMixer AU?
As I don't know yet what I will get, I'm going to try and analyse what happens.



Thank you very much for your kind help! Philippe


On Apr 2, 2009, at 14:35, tahome izwah wrote:
Maybe I don't get it but why would you want to bother with the
overhead of using an extra AU for this if you need the channels for
internal use only anyway... just use array of floats within your AU to
process 12 channels with your DSP code.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Coreaudio-api mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


References: 
 >Re: Internal multi-channels (From: Philippe GRUCHET <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Internal multi-channels (From: james mccartney <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Internal multi-channels (From: tahome izwah <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Internal multi-channels (From: Brian Willoughby <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Internal multi-channels
  • Next by Date: auval and version
  • Previous by thread: Re: Internal multi-channels
  • Next by thread: Re: Internal multi-channels
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread