• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Using SystemConfiguration API inside KEXT
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Using SystemConfiguration API inside KEXT


  • Subject: Re: Using SystemConfiguration API inside KEXT
  • From: Jens Alfke <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 14:18:24 -0700


On May 11, 2010, at 1:36 PM, John B Brown wrote:

even an Apple proprietary form, but the call as listed in the original note, <SystemConfiguration/SystemConfiguration.h>, looks like classic C language. Ie. look under the include tree.
I suggested there was no way that call could produce the header because the file did not exist as the include call described.

The behavior of #include <...> is compiler- and OS-dependent. It just means the compiler should look at some unspecified set of system headers when resolving the filename. GCC has mechanisms for describing a set of system include directories to be searched. Mac OS X additionally enables a mainline GCC extension for 'frameworks', which are a handy way to package up headers with their libraries. These are specified using a different flag to GCC.


There is nothing contrary to any standard going on here. Of course it's different from Linux. It's a different OS. Standards are written with the understanding that there are going to be multiple implementations that are different from each other. Deal with it.

If you want behavior that's more like you're used to, consider writing your own GCC command lines and makefiles.

Another peeve; the replies are missing the originals! In a technical discussion it's nice to know we are all discussing the same problem

Please don't start a second religious war. There are several formats for replying to emails and everyone has their favorite. Flaming about them is incredibly tiresome and likely to get you moderated.


If you want to know exactly what an email was in reply to, look at the threaded view in Thunderbird (which is what you seem to be using to read mail.) Or you can always refer to the In-Reply-To and References: message headers.

—Jens _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


References: 
 >Using SystemConfiguration API inside KEXT (From: Andy Huang <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Using SystemConfiguration API inside KEXT (From: John B Brown <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Using SystemConfiguration API inside KEXT (From: Jean-Daniel Dupas <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Using SystemConfiguration API inside KEXT (From: John B Brown <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Using SystemConfiguration API inside KEXT (From: Jean-Daniel Dupas <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Using SystemConfiguration API inside KEXT (From: Uli Kusterer <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Using SystemConfiguration API inside KEXT (From: Jean-Daniel Dupas <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Using SystemConfiguration API inside KEXT (From: John B Brown <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Using SystemConfiguration API inside KEXT (From: Mo McRoberts <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Using SystemConfiguration API inside KEXT (From: David Leimbach <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Using SystemConfiguration API inside KEXT (From: John B Brown <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Using SystemConfiguration API inside KEXT (From: Jean-Daniel Dupas <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Using SystemConfiguration API inside KEXT (From: John B Brown <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Using SystemConfiguration API inside KEXT (From: Kevin Van Vechten <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Using SystemConfiguration API inside KEXT (From: John B Brown <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Using SystemConfiguration API inside KEXT
  • Next by Date: Re: Using SystemConfiguration API inside KEXT
  • Previous by thread: Re: Using SystemConfiguration API inside KEXT
  • Next by thread: Re: Using SystemConfiguration API inside KEXT
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread