Re: [Fed-Talk] Re: FIPS 140-2 discussion...
Re: [Fed-Talk] Re: FIPS 140-2 discussion...
- Subject: Re: [Fed-Talk] Re: FIPS 140-2 discussion...
- From: "Timothy J. Miller" <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 11:46:10 -0500
Amanda Walker wrote:
EAL2 is not a terribly high bar, though. Jaguar made it to EAL3 when
configured properly, as I recall.
Yes, but there are *far* more non-CC validated systems in existence than
there are CC validated systems. Especially when one considers that
many *patches* invalidate the validation. :)
-- Tim
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Fed-talk mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden