Re: [Fed-Talk] MACs are not authorized on network (UNCLASSIFIED)
Re: [Fed-Talk] MACs are not authorized on network (UNCLASSIFIED)
- Subject: Re: [Fed-Talk] MACs are not authorized on network (UNCLASSIFIED)
- From: "Nichols, Jared - 1170 - MITLL" <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2010 12:56:41 -0400
- Acceptlanguage: en-US
- Thread-topic: [Fed-Talk] MACs are not authorized on network (UNCLASSIFIED)
This is more a curiosity than anything else but...
How do people cope with buying new hardware if 10.6 is not yet supported?
j
--
Jared F. Nichols
Desktop Engineer, Client Services
Information Services Department
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
244 Wood Street
Lexington, Massachusetts 02420
781.981.5436
On 8/6/10 12:53 PM, "Simon Hartley" <email@hidden> wrote:
>FYI
>For Mac OS X 10.5, the Army Golden Master AGM9 specifies using Thursby
>ADmitMac for CAC in the workplace. It's the approved standard.
>
>Mac OS X 10.6 is not officially approved by the Army at this
>time. AGM10, around 10.6, is a work in progress.
>
>ADmitMac solves the issue of CAC cards/Active Directory/DFS/Network
>volume connections but certain items mentioned in these posts really
>relate to functionality in Mac mail clients, browsers and ability to
>interact with MS Office.
>
>These are issues for any non-Windows client such as a Linux desktop since
>there are always two steps in interoperability - first infrastructure -
>can I log in, can I see network drives etc, and then secondarily how do I
>work with Exchange, files from MS Office, or Visio, or interact with
>sites written using Active X, how do I work with Citrix etc.
>
>Thursby ADmitMac for PKI solves CAC cards/Active Directory/DFS/Network
>volumes for 10.5 and 10.6 for infrastructural connections but the
>end-to-end picture is one of many players.
>
>It's a fairly well worn path for Linux desktops in the commercial world
>but still a work in progress for Macs in the PC enterprise.
>
>Simon
>
>On Aug 6, 2010, at 10:39 AM, Blankenship, Bob J Mr CTR US USA IMCOM wrote:
>
>Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
>Caveats: NONE
>
>Thanks to everyone's suggestions on how best to deal with this problem.
>This
>may work out to be the best thing that has happened to us. Will post more
>latter as plans develop.
>
>Thanks again and it is still Hot in Huntsville. Broke an all time high
>record for one day this week. It was 103..
>
>
>Bob Blankenship
>
>Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
>Caveats: NONE
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>Fed-talk mailing list (email@hidden)
>Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
>This email sent to email@hidden
>
> _______________________________________________
>Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>Fed-talk mailing list (email@hidden)
>Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
>This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Fed-talk mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden