• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: [Fed-Talk] Which Seagate 1 TB drives are a problem?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Fed-Talk] Which Seagate 1 TB drives are a problem?


  • Subject: Re: [Fed-Talk] Which Seagate 1 TB drives are a problem?
  • From: Joel Peterson <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 15:03:03 +0000
  • Thread-topic: [Fed-Talk] Which Seagate 1 TB drives are a problem?

Based on a small sampling I did here at the VA, I believe all 1,250 27"
iMacs purchased in 2010 as a part of a hardware refresh are impacted. How
we're going to get all these backed up, scrubbed, and serviced is mind
boggling. I sure hope Apple comes through and doesn't force field IT staff
to take these systems to the local Genius Bar for servicing.

Joel Peterson
email@hidden


On 10/17/12 7:32 AM, "Michael Kluskens" <email@hidden> wrote:

>"Apple has determined that certain Seagate 1TB hard drives used in
>21.5-inch and 27-inch iMac systems may fail. These systems were sold
>between October 2009 and July 2011."
>
>Is anyone aware of the range of Seagate drives that is affected by this
>issue, including those not installed in Apple iMacs.  Last time Seagate
>had a big problem it turned out we had recently purchased 16 of the
>affected drives and even with the recommended firmware patch they failed
>at a much higher rate then any other hard drives we had including the 320
>GB Seagate hard drives that shipped with 34 Mac Pros we used for a
>cluster.
>
>Since we can't take advantage of this program, that is returning our
>iMacs and/or affected drives, does anyone know which SMART parameters to
>watch for this issue (understanding that a Google study determined that
>less than 50% of hard drive failures could be predicted using SMART
>parameters).
>
>Michael
>
>ps. I know someone will point to a DoD authorized provider; however, our
>security has said we can't use those, mostly because they don't have
>written DoD documentation and procedures in hand that says we can.
> _______________________________________________
>Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>Fed-talk mailing list      (email@hidden)
>Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
>This email sent to email@hidden
>



 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Fed-talk mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

References: 
 >[Fed-Talk] Which Seagate 1 TB drives are a problem? (From: Michael Kluskens <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: [Fed-Talk] Which Seagate 1 TB drives are a problem?
  • Next by Date: Re: [Fed-Talk] Which Seagate 1 TB drives are a problem?
  • Previous by thread: Re: [Fed-Talk] Which Seagate 1 TB drives are a problem?
  • Next by thread: Re: [Fed-Talk] Which Seagate 1 TB drives are a problem?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread