RE: Carbon CFM
RE: Carbon CFM
- Subject: RE: Carbon CFM
- From: "Pietrzak, Bryan" <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 09:39:10 -0600
For what it's worth. I'd like to see Apple justify mach-o over CFM. From
what I've seen, the calling conventions in CFM are faster:
http://lists.apple.com/mhonarc/mac-games-dev/msg06595.html
If mach-o is slower, why use it? If it's just a convenience with BSD say so,
but if Apple is going to say that CFM is technically slower, than that feels
like a lie to me and I'd like to know. Just be honest with me and I'll be
satisfied. I'd love to see a Q&A or technote explaining this issue.
Bryan
-----Original Message-----
From: Quinn [
mailto:email@hidden]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 9:41 AM
To: email@hidden
Subject: Re: Carbon CFM callbacks for CFNetServices
Apple's official policy (as set by *way* upper management--please
don't shoot the messenger) is that developers should move away from
CFM and towards Mach-O,
_______________________________________________
macnetworkprog mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/macnetworkprog
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.