• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Anything new on the Horizon of Webobjects
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Anything new on the Horizon of Webobjects


  • Subject: Re: Anything new on the Horizon of Webobjects
  • From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 21:06:02 -0800

Hi Bob,

At 03:54 PM 28/10/2003 -0800, Bob McCormick wrote:
>On Oct 28, 2003, at 1:27 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
>
>> This is about widening deployment options not reducing costs on an
>> already very inexpensive tool.
>>
>
>Hi Chuck,
>
>Well, this last thought has got me to thinking and is probably where
>I'm not connecting all of the dots.  If I have to have a WO deployment
>license, yet intend to release on JBoss, is there still going to be a
>place where I enter the license information?
>
When you build the application WO will pickup the installed license.  I
think.  There must be some way to set or replace this with the ultimate
license.  Sorry, I'm not really up on the intricate details of this.


>I was under the
>impression that this license only comes into play if you are running
>your application against the WO server which will prompt you for a
>license.
>
No.  The license comes into play every time you run a WO app, regardless of
how you start it.  You are not licensing the WO appserver but rather the
com.webobjects.* code frameworks.


>Haven't done this yet, so just kinda curious on how they are
>going to manage something like this.
>
If the app starts and does not find a valid license it terminates
immediately.  Pretty effective.  :-)


>Guess I was looking at the libraries/frameworks as widgets that I can
>build apps with as long as I purchase a legit development copy.
>
You can look at them like that, but don't expect Apple's lawyers to take
the same viewpoint.  ;-)  When you purchase a copy of WO you are purchasing
one development license and one deployment license.  They may be used
*concurrently* on *different* machines.  For the price Apple is charging
for WO that seems pretty darn reasonable if not outright generous.


>If I
>wish to deploy on WO, I'm going to have to enter a license, cause I'm
>using their server.
>
No, because you are using their frameworks.  Your WO app can be deployed on
WebSphere, WebLogic, Tomcat, and now JBoss.  You might need to pay separate
fees for WebLogic.

See
http://a368.g.akamai.net/7/368/51/b0b6164bb0583f/www.apple.com/webobjects/pd
f/L24667A_WebOb_DS.pdf



>If not, then my code can run on something that I'm
>not paying Apple to support.  No problem here paying license fees, but
>those fees do affect the type of market one can develop for.  Gonna
>need to to obtain some clarification here.
>
I hope that has cleared it up, at least some.  The license is for the WO
runtime, aka the frameworks, not the appserver.


>Then, I've got to wonder why would someone want to deploy to a JBoss or
>Tomcat, if they have to do a WO license anyway?  Does a WO application
>perform better in a java container than the CGI based app server?  (not
>trying to bash here - just trying to understand the WHYs)
>
WO deployment has been known to have some problems.  There may be a real
benefit to using something like Tomcat or JBoss.  I'm not an expert in this
area, I don't even play one on the Internet.  :-)  The real benefit, as far
as I can see, is market penetration.  This brings WO one step closer to the
mainstream J2EE/EJB/JSP/Struts nastiness, er, architecture.  "Yes sir, we
will build you a Pure Java, standards based application that you can deploy
in whatever J2EE appserver that your organization has chosen".  It is one
less hurdle to overcome when getting WO used for a project.  It allows the
admins to avoid learning a new and unusual deployment environment and the
J2EE appservers are more likely to be support by third party admin tools.


>Be interested in hearing if anyone has actually deployed to a full
>blown java container like JBoss or Tomcat.
>
There have been past postings on this, either here or on the Omni lists.
Sorry, no links at hand.


Chuck

--

Chuck Hill                                 email@hidden
Global Village Consulting Inc.             http://www.global-village.net
_______________________________________________
webobjects-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/webobjects-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Anything new on the Horizon of Webobjects
      • From: petite_abeille <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: Anything new on the Horizon of Webobjects (From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>)
 >Anything new on the Horizon of Webobjects (From: James Hays <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Anything new on the Horizon of Webobjects (From: Bob McCormick <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Anything new on the Horizon of Webobjects (From: Bob McCormick <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Filtering array returned by an EO's relationship (D2J)
  • Next by Date: Re: Problem updating to WebObjects 5.2.2
  • Previous by thread: Re: Anything new on the Horizon of Webobjects
  • Next by thread: Re: Anything new on the Horizon of Webobjects
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread