Re: Anything new on the Horizon of Webobjects
Re: Anything new on the Horizon of Webobjects
- Subject: Re: Anything new on the Horizon of Webobjects
- From: Bob McCormick <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 15:54:18 -0800
On Oct 28, 2003, at 1:27 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
This is about widening deployment options not reducing costs on an
already very inexpensive tool.
Hi Chuck,
Well, this last thought has got me to thinking and is probably where
I'm not connecting all of the dots. If I have to have a WO deployment
license, yet intend to release on JBoss, is there still going to be a
place where I enter the license information? I was under the
impression that this license only comes into play if you are running
your application against the WO server which will prompt you for a
license. Haven't done this yet, so just kinda curious on how they are
going to manage something like this.
Guess I was looking at the libraries/frameworks as widgets that I can
build apps with as long as I purchase a legit development copy. If I
wish to deploy on WO, I'm going to have to enter a license, cause I'm
using their server. If not, then my code can run on something that I'm
not paying Apple to support. No problem here paying license fees, but
those fees do affect the type of market one can develop for. Gonna
need to to obtain some clarification here.
Then, I've got to wonder why would someone want to deploy to a JBoss or
Tomcat, if they have to do a WO license anyway? Does a WO application
perform better in a java container than the CGI based app server? (not
trying to bash here - just trying to understand the WHYs)
Be interested in hearing if anyone has actually deployed to a full
blown java container like JBoss or Tomcat.
Later...Bob
_______________________________________________
webobjects-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/webobjects-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.