Re: WO or PHP?
Re: WO or PHP?
- Subject: Re: WO or PHP?
- From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:31:53 -0800
- Organization: Global Village Consulting, Inc.
Richard Peskin wrote:
We are starting a reasonably large new project that appears to have
characteristics that would imply WO is the appropriate development and
deployment system (e.g. user interaction with a database, etc.)
>
For a larger project WO seems the much better choice. "large" and
"PHP" suggest "maintenance nightmare" to me.
However, much of the actual web page designs have been done using
Dreamweaver and its templates. I have not found it easy to incorporate
WO into Dreamweaver maintained pages (no real Dreamweaver support for
WO). Would we be better off using PHP?
>
I usually try to avoid tools like Dreamweaver as they tend to produce
bloated files of bad HTML. Hence, I have no useful advice to you. Is
is easier to maintain the HTML or lots and lots of PHP?
Also, is Apple really committed
to future support for WO? On the surface, it doesn't look like Apple is
emphasizing WO as it has in the past.
We'd all like to know that. Only Steve knows and he's not telling.
Chuck
--
Chuck Hill email@hidden
Global Village Consulting Inc. http://www.global-village.net
Progress is the mother of all problems.
- G. K. Chesterton
_______________________________________________
webobjects-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/webobjects-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
| References: | |
| | >WO or PHP? (From: Richard Peskin <email@hidden>) |