Re: OT: OpenSource WebObjects...
Re: OT: OpenSource WebObjects...
- Subject: Re: OT: OpenSource WebObjects...
- From: Christopher Pavicich <email@hidden>
- Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 23:03:52 -0500
Highly unlikely. Spin-offs are expensive.
Is Apple's approach really benign neglect? They seem to be adding new
and useful features. WebServices (based on Axis), JBoss support; those
are pretty useful things.
How does it not fit in with Apple's direction?
They just wrote an amazingly successful music store in record time with
a handful of developers. If anything iTMS should be used as a marketing
prop for WO.
--CMP
On Jan 17, 2004, at 22:51, Ed Leafe wrote:
On Jan 17, 2004, at 8:55 PM, Michael Parlee wrote:
WO/EOF is a great tool and I still prefer it over the other tools
I've tried. I don't really agree that making it open source is the
answer though.
Maybe an independent company that can run with it, instead of Apple's
approach of benign neglect. It really doesn't fit in with Apple's
direction, so perhaps spinning it off into a separate company, like
they did with FileMaker, might be the kick it needs to really take
off.
___/
/
__/
/
____/
Ed Leafe
Linux Love:
unzip;strip;touch;finger;mount;fsck;more;yes;umount;sleep
_______________________________________________
WebObjects-talk mailing list
email@hidden
http://www.omnigroup.com/mailman/listinfo/webobjects-talk
_______________________________________________
webobjects-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/webobjects-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.