Re: 5.5.5 Problems
Re: 5.5.5 Problems
- Subject: Re: 5.5.5 Problems
- From: Pierre Frisch <email@hidden>
- Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 08:31:32 -0800
Hi George,
I have on more question for you, are your deployment machine on a
separate network? I am trying to understand the under pinning of that
deployment bug. I think this is a mixture of a change of behavior in
10.3.2/5.2.2 and old bug in the Apache adaptor and an interaction
between development and deployment environments.
I agree that having monitor running permanently does not improve the
stability of the machine but why not integrate it in the UI?
Pierre
--
Pierre Frisch
sPearWay Ltd.
sPearCat Web Catalogs, the flexibility of custom design, the price of a
package.
http://www.spearcat.com/
On Jan 30, 2004, at 19:48, George Domurot wrote:
> Pierre: I'm not sure if any of this information has been helpful.
> However, I just remembered something else. Initially we setup the
> server with JavaMonitor starting at boot time. The system seemed to be
> a bit unstable, after a few days the entire server would reboot. Not
> knowing really why the reboot was occurring, we did 2 things, 1)
> stopped having JavaMonitor start at boot time and 2) disabled "Restart
> automatically if computer freezes" under the Energy Saver settings.
> Change #2 was a recommendation I found posted under the server
> discussion lists. Since we did both of the settings, the system
> stabilized. We never troubleshooted it further to see it the issue was
> simply #1 or #2. In any case, all seems fine, JavaMonitor can be
> started via the command line and the system doesn't mysteriously
> reboot.
>
> -George
>
> On Jan 28, 2004, at 7:26 PM, George Domurot wrote:
>
>> Pierre: It was a bit of a pain at first. Once we got things ironed
>> out, things seem to be working fine. Here are some notes I posted
>> back in November with regards to getting deployment up and running:
>>
>> Begin forwarded message:
>>
>>> Just in case anyone else runs into this problem, here's was cleared
>>> everything up (so far):
>>>
>>> Update /System/Library/StartupItems/WebObjects/WebObjects
>>> - uncomment WOTASKD startup item
>>>
>>> Update /Library/WebObjects/Configuration
>>> - update the Owner as appserver and Group as appserverusr
>>> - If anyone else has the more appropriate setting, please let me
>>> know
>>>
>>> Update /etc/httpd/httpd.config
>>> - add the following at the end of the file:
>>> # Including WebObjects Configs
>>> Include /System/Library/WebObjects/Adaptors/Apache/apache.conf
>>
>> Currently we are running our test deployment environment on an older
>> dual-533 G4 with 1.5MB RAM. We did a format and install with Panther.
>> It's running 2 apps, 2 instances of one and 4 on the other. The 2
>> instance app has light traffic, both stop/start in the middle of the
>> night. The 4 instance app is hit continually 24 hours a day, cycling
>> instances every 3 hours.
>>
>> On Jan 28, 2004, at 4:26 PM, Pierre Frisch wrote:
>>
>>> George,
>>>
>>> Could give a few more details on your installation I have had no end
>>> of problems and I would like to discover the differences i.e.
>>> machine type, memory, connections etc...
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Pierre
>>> --
>>> Pierre Frisch
>>> sPearWay Ltd.
>>> sPearCat Web Catalogs, the flexibility of custom design, the price
>>> of a package.
>>> http://www.spearcat.com/
>>>
>>>
>>> On Jan 28, 2004, at 11:00, George Domurot wrote:
>>>
>>>> Kieran: These are new apps that have been running for about a
>>>> month. We haven't run into any problems (yet).
>>>>
>>>> On Jan 27, 2004, at 4:41 PM, Kieran Kelleher wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> An earlier post in this thread stated that the apps stopped
>>>>> responding after a few days on the WO5.2.2/10.3 combination
>>>>> ........ then, unless I have misinterpreted the situation,
>>>>> scheduling the app instances to restart nightly should keep them
>>>>> running clean. So deploy multiple instances of the same app and
>>>>> schedule them to restart at different times during night-time (if
>>>>> that's off-peak)
>>>>>
>>>>> -K
>>>>>
>>>>> ____________________________________
>>>>> OS X 10.3.2 / WO 5.2.2 / MySQL 4.0.16
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jan 27, 2004, at 11:49 AM, George Domurot wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> James: You'll probably be fine. We have 2 projects that were
>>>>>> created and deployed with 5.2.2. You may want to consider 2
>>>>>> servers when you deploy, they'll make for easy maintenance while
>>>>>> maintaining availability of your apps.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -George
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Jan 26, 2004, at 11:07 PM, james cicenia wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Great!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have convinced my partners to use WebObjects and now
>>>>>>> I am getting very nervous about the 5.2.2 and Panther issues
>>>>>>> especially since I just bought a new XServe!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In addition I have just spent a month reading and modeling
>>>>>>> my application in EOModeler.... this better work.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Also, what do the experienced developers do? What I mean
>>>>>>> is do you use D2W first and then freeze and customize or
>>>>>>> do you just skip that? Also, since I hear a lot of bitching about
>>>>>>> XCode, so I use Eclipse instead?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Just looking to start the development phase this week and
>>>>>>> would like to start with the correct tools and approach.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Any thoughts would surely help me and the others.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> James Cicenia - President/CEO
>>>>>>> cell: 773.398.4649
>>>>>>> www.jimijon.com
>>>>>>> ~~~~~~
>>>>>>> The Internet's only Weekly Video Horoscope!
>>>>>>> http://absinthium.jimijon.com
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> webobjects-dev mailing list | email@hidden
>>>>>>> Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
>>>>>>> http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/webobjects-dev
>>>>>>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> webobjects-dev mailing list | email@hidden
>>>>>> Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
>>>>>> http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/webobjects-dev
>>>>>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> webobjects-dev mailing list | email@hidden
>>>>> Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
>>>>> http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/webobjects-dev
>>>>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> webobjects-dev mailing list | email@hidden
>>>> Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
>>>> http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/webobjects-dev
>>>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> _______________________________________________
> webobjects-dev mailing list | email@hidden
> Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
> http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/webobjects-dev
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
[demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type application/pkcs7-signature which had a name of smime.p7s]
_______________________________________________
webobjects-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/webobjects-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.