• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag
 

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: WebObjects Single Directory / Tomcat deployment
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: WebObjects Single Directory / Tomcat deployment


  • Subject: Re: WebObjects Single Directory / Tomcat deployment
  • From: Jonathan Rochkind <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 16:45:37 -0600

At 4:23 PM -0500 3/4/04, Andy Satori wrote:
It's clear that you have a Dev and Dep license in each box. The deployment licensing when used with teh Apple WO Application Server is crystal clear. I need another WO Retail box.

You can't have a Dev _and_ a Dep license on any box. They are mutually exclusive. But you don't need both either---the Dep license allows you to do anything you can do with the Dev license, plus more. In the old days, if you wanted Dev tools on a box that had a Dep license, you'd have to enter a Dev key in the install phase, to get the tools installed, and then "upgrade" the license to Dep. You may or may not still need to do that, depending on your OS.


But in the end, you might want a Deployment license on both machines; you don't need and can't have more than one license per machine.

The real meat of your question though, I don't know. I suspect you need a Dep license on every machine you want to deploy on, regardless of the method of deployment (SSDD or WO typical). The _place_ the license is recorded may differ depending on your type of deployment, but I think the intent is simply that you need one (no more and no less) deployment license per deployment host. Same as for standard WO deployment.

--Jonathan


But...

With a single directory deployment, your license is tied to the war, and there is no Application Server installation and license. This would imply that the license is a run-time license tied to the application, not the application server. I can't find anything in the license that implicitly discusses the situation regarding the SSDD deployment options.

What I infer currently is that either, A, the intent of the SSDD deployment is that it can be deployed without the WO license and is tied to the Development kit (much like the MS ASP.NET run-time license is tied to the compiler, not the host), or B, the intent is that you rebuild the app with a new Deployment license for each and every licensed deployment.

I'd like to hear from the community how you understand and read this, because candidly, I'm confused.

Andy
_______________________________________________
webobjects-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/webobjects-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
_______________________________________________
webobjects-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/webobjects-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.


References: 
 >WebObjects Single Directory / Tomcat deployment (From: Andy Satori <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: refreshes refetched objects: effects on performance?
  • Next by Date: Re: WebObjects Single Directory / Tomcat deployment
  • Previous by thread: Re: WebObjects Single Directory / Tomcat deployment
  • Next by thread: Eclipse, WOLips & Frontbase - Adding FrontBaseEOAdaptor.framework to my project
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread